← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eamon Powell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-10 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #116  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 7 14 21 0.375 0.2908 0.2981 1.3957 1.4309
2019-20 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 43 6 8 14 0.326 0.2525 0.2525 1.2119 1.2119
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SR 32 4 16 20 0.625
2023-24 Boston College D1 HockeyEast JR 40 5 33 38 0.950
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 36 5 17 22 0.611
2021-22 Boston College D1 HockeyEast FR 38 0 9 9 0.237
2020-21 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 24 2 12 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2020-21 · Boston College
+107.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3169
Defenseman overall
#856
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ RPI (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.