IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Doolin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — USHL 46 5 6 11 0.239 0.1410 0.1327 0.7181 0.6758
2019-20 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 57 19 33 52 0.912 0.3515 0.3515 1.3277 1.3277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Colby D3 NESCAC — 23 1 5 6 0.261
2022-23 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 7 15 22 0.846
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20212
Forward overall
#998
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2022-23
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.