← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolai Charchenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3552 0.3890 1.0499 1.1498
2019-20 Minot Minotauros NAHL 46 0 9 9 0.196 0.0695 0.0695 0.2055 0.2055
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 48 0 7 7 0.146 0.0518 0.0518 0.1531 0.1531
2021-22 Minot Minotauros NAHL 60 3 9 12 0.200 0.0710 0.0673 0.2100 0.1989
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 27 1 5 6 0.222
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Colorado College D1 NCHC 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21774
Defenseman overall
#3185
Defenseman born in 2001
#6071
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.