← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Goukler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Nashville Jr. Predators NA3HL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.1255 0.1411 0.3157 0.3550
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0459 0.0500 0.1319 0.1437
2019-20 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0735 0.0735 0.2111 0.2111
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 54 1 17 18 0.333 0.1225 0.1225 0.3518 0.3518
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 56 3 15 18 0.321 0.1181 0.1112 0.3392 0.3194
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 1 9 10 0.370
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 22 1 2 3 0.136
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 24 1 2 3 0.125
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 17 2 1 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Alaska Anchorage
+115.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14261
Defenseman overall
#2423
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2008-09
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2011-12
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.