IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Campbell Balk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 44 12 34 46 1.046 0.2843 0.2620 0.6589 0.6072
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE JR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2020-21 Endicott D1 — SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2019-20 Endicott D1 — FR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE FR 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Endicott
+11.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17211
Forward overall
#808
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.