IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Faber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-22 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 2, Pick #45  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NTDP-U18 57 3 12 15 0.263 0.2041 0.2122 0.9796 1.0182
2019-20 — NTDP-U18 46 3 9 12 0.261 0.2023 0.2023 0.9710 0.9710
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 38 4 23 27 0.711
2021-22 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 32 2 12 14 0.438
2020-21 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 27 1 11 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Minnesota
+121.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Bliss
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Butrus Ghafari
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Charles Manley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ RPI (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Fortunato
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keegan Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2012-13
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2013-14
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.