IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Benson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Moorhead High USHS-MN 25 4 1 5 0.200 0.0246 0.0257 0.0486 0.0508
2017-18 Portage Terriers MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 — NCDC 34 10 6 16 0.471 0.1088 0.1059 — —
2019-20 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0683 0.0683 0.2019 0.2019
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 27 11 5 16 0.593
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 26 11 14 25 0.962
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 26 12 9 21 0.808
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37057
Forward overall
#2046
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Woolley
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Baird
St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Hogg
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.