← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Baird Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-10-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 BCHL 43 1 4 5 0.116 0.0448 0.0507 0.1693 0.1915
2002-03 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 19 21 40 0.667 0.2569 0.2794 0.9702 1.0554
2003-04 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 53 12 21 33 0.623 0.2399 0.2503 0.9061 0.9453
2004-05 BCHL 60 18 29 47 0.783 0.3018 0.3008 1.1399 1.1360
2005-06 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 45 8 18 26 0.578 0.2226 0.2107 0.8409 0.7959
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 28 8 16 24 0.857
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 25 4 11 15 0.600
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 28 10 9 19 0.679
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 21 4 5 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
+102.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22287
Forward overall
#710
Forward born in 1985
#1132
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.