← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Baird Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-10-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 BCHL 43 1 4 5 0.116 0.0453 0.0512 0.1696 0.1918
2002-03 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 19 21 40 0.667 0.2595 0.2823 0.9722 1.0575
2003-04 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 53 12 21 33 0.623 0.2423 0.2528 0.9079 0.9472
2004-05 BCHL 60 18 29 47 0.783 0.3049 0.3039 1.1423 1.1384
2005-06 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 45 8 18 26 0.578 0.2249 0.2129 0.8426 0.7975
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 SR 28 8 16 24 0.857
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 JR 25 4 11 15 0.600
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 SO 28 10 9 19 0.679
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 FR 21 4 5 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
+100.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14163
Forward overall
#512
Forward born in 1985
#1208
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.