IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Picciano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnetonka High USHS-MN 23 0 5 5 0.217 0.0275 0.0287 0.0528 0.0551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SO 7 1 0 1 0.143
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 7 1 0 1 0.143
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 13 1 2 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+838.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#55903
Forward overall
#3392
Forward born in 1999
#5485
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Nolan Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Gersich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
J.J. Piccinich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Dodero
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ American International (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Myers
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Hogg
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gunner Vignaroli
Salem State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.