← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Hogg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-12-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 39 0 7 7 0.179 0.0669 0.0775 0.2615 0.3029
2015-16 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 42 3 7 10 0.238 0.0887 0.0980 0.3469 0.3832
2016-17 BCHL 59 7 20 27 0.458 0.1705 0.1796 0.6668 0.7024
2017-18 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 57 0 10 10 0.175 0.0653 0.0657 0.2556 0.2570
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 6 14 20 0.408 0.2276 0.2195 0.3301 0.3184
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC GR 26 3 14 17 0.654
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 22 2 7 9 0.409
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2019-20 Plattsburgh D1 FR 18 5 1 6 0.333
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 18 5 1 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2019-20 · Plattsburgh
+123.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9423
Defenseman overall
#1729
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.