← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-22 Country: USA
2016 · Round 5, Pick #125  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
Signed Professionally
Leksands IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 NTDP-U18 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.2287 0.2370 1.1482 1.1900
2013-14 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 60 4 9 13 0.217 0.1611 0.1581 0.8086 0.7937
2024-25 Södertälje SK Allsvenskan 49 22 30 52 1.061 2.6530 2.2734 9.9561 8.5316
2025-26 Leksands IF SHL 49 7 11 18 0.367 0.9183 0.9183 4.7928 4.7928
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 38 24 18 42 1.105
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 17 10 12 22 1.294
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 41 20 22 42 1.024
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 36 3 9 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Northeastern
+105.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#748
Forward overall
#41
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.98 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.