IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-22 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Södertälje SK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NTDP-U18 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.2447 0.2536 1.1524 1.1943
2013-14 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 60 4 9 13 0.217 0.1724 0.1692 0.8116 0.7967
2024-25 Södertälje SK Allsvenskan 49 22 30 52 1.061 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 38 24 18 42 1.105
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 17 10 12 22 1.294
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 41 20 22 42 1.024
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 36 3 9 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Northeastern
+91.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21048
Forward overall
#877
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Salerno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Moy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2014-15
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2000-01
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.