IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Page Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 42 3 19 22 0.524 0.2136 0.2136 0.4191 0.4191
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 15 2 8 10 0.667 0.2718 0.2631 0.5335 0.5165
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 23 0 2 2 0.087
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2199
Defenseman overall
#524
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Routh
St. Michael's College · 2018-19
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Luedtke
Concordia · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.