← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Gallatin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 2 13 15 0.268 0.1991 0.2052 0.9996 1.0300
2019-20 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 47 2 10 12 0.255 0.1898 0.1898 0.9526 0.9526
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 46 5 16 21 0.457 0.2693 0.2693 1.3711 1.3711
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 36 4 11 15 0.417
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 37 7 23 30 0.811
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 37 6 11 17 0.460
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 42 2 15 17 0.405
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2021-22 · Minnesota Duluth
+109.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4074
Defenseman overall
#1052
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2012-13
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2013-14
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.