| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Northern Manitoba Blizzard | MJHL | 27 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.333 | 0.0642 | 0.0674 | 0.2100 | 0.2204 |
| 2017-18 | Northern Manitoba Blizzard | MJHL | 57 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 0.509 | 0.0979 | 0.0980 | 0.3206 | 0.3210 |
| 2018-19 | Dauphin Kings | MJHL | 45 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 0.444 | 0.0855 | 0.0809 | 0.2801 | 0.2651 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Salem State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 26 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.038 |
| 2021-22 | Salem State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 22 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.227 |
| 2020-21 | Salem State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Salem State | D1 | — | FR | 23 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.217 |
| 2019-20 | Salem State | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 23 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.217 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.