← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eamonn Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 27 4 5 9 0.333 0.0642 0.0674 0.2100 0.2204
2017-18 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 57 11 18 29 0.509 0.0979 0.0980 0.3206 0.3210
2018-19 Dauphin Kings MJHL 45 12 8 20 0.444 0.0855 0.0809 0.2801 0.2651
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 1 0 1 0.038
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2019-20 · Salem State
+189.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42510
Forward overall
#2241
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2008-09
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.