IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Kane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 48 11 19 30 0.625 0.2548 0.2728 0.5024 0.5379
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 54 20 44 64 1.185 0.4354 0.4354 1.2510 1.2510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA — 33 8 22 30 0.909
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA — 34 8 9 17 0.500
2021-22 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 26 5 9 14 0.538
2020-21 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 19 4 2 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2020-21 · Mercyhurst
+35.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
98%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7554
Forward overall
#326
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.