← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaiah Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Holderness NE-Prep 30 22 14 36 1.200 0.2304 0.2304 0.5467 0.5467
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 50 16 21 37 0.740 0.2629 0.2629 0.7806 0.7806
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 50 17 24 41 0.820 0.2913 0.2913 0.8649 0.8649
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 31 9 7 16 0.516
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 37 14 21 35 0.946
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SO 24 9 1 10 0.417
2021-22 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA FR 28 4 4 8 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2021-22 · Long Island Univ.
+44.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14411
Forward overall
#600
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2000-01
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2006-07
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.