IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauri Sertti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-07-11 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 49 6 24 30 0.612 0.3318 0.3279 0.9258 0.9150
2019-20 Houston Bulls NAHL 47 8 20 28 0.596 0.2189 0.2189 0.6288 0.6288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 American International D1 AHA — 37 1 6 7 0.189
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC — 36 2 6 8 0.222
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC — 35 4 11 15 0.429
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC — 40 2 6 8 0.200
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3747
Defenseman overall
#887
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Graham Fallon
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2017-18
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Barkley
Neumann · 2022-23
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.