← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Kyrkostas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 52 6 14 20 0.385 0.1366 0.1366 0.4038 0.4038
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0770 0.2695 0.2695
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 60 19 31 50 0.833 0.2960 0.2775 0.8749 0.8202
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 22 3 11 14 0.636
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 21 4 13 17 0.809
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 28 10 13 23 0.821
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC 24 4 5 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Albertus Magnus
+57.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20266
Forward overall
#955
Forward born in 2001
#1319
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.