← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 49 8 8 16 0.327 0.1200 0.1200 0.3446 0.3446
2020-21 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 30 20 21 41 1.367 0.1715 0.1715 0.4315 0.4315
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 14 30 44 0.759 0.2787 0.2619 0.8007 0.7524
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 15 1 10 11 0.733
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 24 5 13 18 0.750
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 27 12 20 32 1.185
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 26 3 10 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+123.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19306
Forward overall
#912
Forward born in 2001
#1215
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.