IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Truscott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-12 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #144  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 5 12 17 0.309 0.2397 0.2448 1.1504 1.1750
2019-20 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 47 5 16 21 0.447 0.3464 0.3464 1.6629 1.6629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen GR 36 3 13 16 0.444
2023-24 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 41 2 14 16 0.390
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 23 4 12 16 0.696
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 40 2 15 17 0.425
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 26 1 4 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2020-21 · Michigan
-16.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2965
Defenseman overall
#781
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Jack Glover
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Keegan Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.