IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trent DeNuccio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 49 23 14 37 0.755 0.4210 0.4200 0.6106 0.6091
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 32 3 5 8 0.250 0.0990 0.0990 0.2625 0.2625
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 8 0 4 4 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · SUNY Geneseo
+39.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19101
Forward overall
#931
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Suderman
Concordia · 2008-09
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Kulas
Neumann · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.