IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Prouty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 0.1067 0.1067 0.2826 0.2826
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 47 0 4 4 0.085 0.0337 0.0337 0.0893 0.0893
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 59 3 20 23 0.390 0.1544 0.1501 0.4093 0.3978
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SR 39 2 12 14 0.359
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 28 0 6 6 0.214
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 30 2 9 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+158.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16225
Defenseman overall
#2659
Defenseman born in 2001
#5182
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Perrone
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Coleman
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Twombly
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.