IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Kuzma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NCDC 25 8 9 17 0.680 0.1571 0.1601 0.5498 0.5601
2019-20 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 15 0 3 3 0.200 0.0710 0.0710 0.2100 0.2100
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 36 14 17 31 0.861 0.1990 0.1990 0.6963 0.6963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 23 10 8 18 0.783
2023-24 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 20 12 7 19 0.950
2022-23 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 16 8 7 15 0.938
2021-22 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 24 8 5 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2021-22 · Amherst
+295.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13249
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 2000
#349
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Rubino
Williams · 2007-08
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Curry
Canton · 2010-11
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Oye
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.