IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Casper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — NAHL 40 5 14 19 0.475 0.1687 0.1728 0.4987 0.5107
2022-23 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 36 7 4 11 0.306 0.1085 0.1058 0.3208 0.3128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 New England D3 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 New England D3 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · New England
+95.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36826
Forward overall
#2256
Forward born in 2002
#3741
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Techel
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Raymond Fleming
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Wurst
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.