IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Frojelin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 42 8 25 33 0.786 0.0725 0.0704 0.1799 0.1748
2016-17 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 35 5 30 35 1.000 0.0923 0.0844 0.2290 0.2093
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Marian D1 NCHA SR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Nazareth D1 UCHC JR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2018-19 Nazareth D1 UCHC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9810
Defenseman overall
#1500
Defenseman born in 1996
#200
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cameron Gardiner
Misericordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Blair
Marian · 2006-07
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Santay
Morrisville · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.