← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicolas Coppola Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 24 14 18 32 1.333 0.1744 0.1744
2020-21 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 32 14 17 31 0.969 0.1267 0.1267 0.3288 0.3288
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 38 6 8 14 0.368 0.0851 0.0806 0.1803 0.1708
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 26 7 3 10 0.385
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2023-24 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 23 5 4 9 0.391
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 17 0 3 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Westfield State
+155.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20291
Forward overall
#974
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.