IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Schell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 40 5 11 16 0.400 0.1557 0.1558 0.5833 0.5837
2008-09 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 6 16 22 0.367 0.1427 0.1368 0.5348 0.5127
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 7 28 35 0.583 0.2270 0.2052 0.8506 0.7690
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 29 2 2 4 0.138
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 24 3 4 7 0.292
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 24 8 7 15 0.625
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2010-11 · SUNY Geneseo
+91.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22296
Forward overall
#887
Forward born in 1989
#2010
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Glynn Robitaille
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.