IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Schell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 40 5 11 16 0.400 0.1541 0.1542 0.5821 0.5825
2008-09 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 6 16 22 0.367 0.1413 0.1355 0.5337 0.5116
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 7 28 35 0.583 0.2247 0.2032 0.8489 0.7675
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 29 2 2 4 0.138
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 24 3 4 7 0.292
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 24 8 7 15 0.625
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2010-11 · SUNY Geneseo
+93.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32235
Forward overall
#1071
Forward born in 1989
#1805
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Kesselring
Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.