IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Gelatt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 24 5 11 16 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2019-20 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 25 18 24 42 1.680 0.3328 0.3328 0.7654 0.7654
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 51 24 30 54 1.059 0.3890 0.3890 1.1176 1.1176
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 37 7 10 17 0.460
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 38 6 7 13 0.342
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 38 0 3 3 0.079
2021-22 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 36 2 10 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2021-22 · Holy Cross
+54.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9719
Forward overall
#427
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jestin Somero
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.