IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Niemo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 20 30 50 1.042 0.4247 0.4247 0.8373 0.8373
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 52 17 36 53 1.019 0.3745 0.3745 1.0758 1.0758
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 60 38 36 74 1.233 0.4531 0.4251 1.3017 1.2212
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 23 3 2 5 0.217
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 17 2 2 4 0.235
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA — 32 8 14 22 0.688
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2022-23 · Bentley
+88.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5749
Forward overall
#229
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Enns
Marian · 2018-19
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Broad
Trinity · 2023-24
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.