IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian DiCesare Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 South Shore Kings NCDC 26 2 4 6 0.231 0.0941 0.0929 0.1855 0.1832
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 42 1 3 4 0.095 0.0562 0.0505 0.2859 0.2567
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18350
Defenseman overall
#2653
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew McCormack
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas White
Trine · 2024-25
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Rutigliano
Hamilton · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.