IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Neuharth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 26 18 35 53 2.038 0.2581 0.2581 0.4952 0.4952
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 39 6 19 25 0.641 0.2355 0.2355 0.6766 0.6766
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 31 8 21 29 0.935 0.3437 0.3324 0.9874 0.9549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 33 2 3 5 0.151
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 29 3 6 9 0.310
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Colgate
-70.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10401
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Speck
Endicott · 2024-25
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.