← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Willey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 24 11 9 20 0.833 0.2351 0.2351 0.3813 0.3813
2019-20 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 25 15 9 24 0.960 0.2708 0.2708 0.4393 0.4393
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 49 10 11 21 0.429 0.1698 0.1698 0.4500 0.4500
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 12 4 16 0.296 0.1174 0.1101 0.3111 0.2918
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA SR 14 2 0 2 0.143
2024-25 Army D1 AHA JR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SO 20 1 1 2 0.100
2022-23 Army D1 AHA FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Army
+11.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33374
Forward overall
#1788
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.