← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Kim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 6 9 15 0.294 0.1133 0.1148 0.4280 0.4338
2019-20 BCHL 48 1 17 18 0.375 0.1445 0.1445 0.5457 0.5457
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 24 5 15 20 0.833 0.3062 0.3062 0.8795 0.8795
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 13 1 4 5 0.385
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 24 0 21 21 0.875
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 24 1 12 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2021-22 · Salve Regina
+399.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5725
Defenseman overall
#1203
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2023-24
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2020-21
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.