IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Terhell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cambridge-Isanti USHS-MN 27 12 13 25 0.926 0.1172 0.1172 0.2249 0.2249
2022-23 Cambridge-Isanti USHS-MN 26 25 22 47 1.808 0.2289 0.2289 0.4391 0.4391
2023-24 Cambridge-Isanti USHS-MN 27 27 16 43 1.593 0.2016 0.2016 0.3868 0.3868
2024-25 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 33 15 18 33 1.000 0.1255 0.1268 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Saint John's
+103.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12035
Forward overall
#566
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Crone
Concordia · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Ames
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.