IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Terhell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-02 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cambridge-Isanti USHS-MN 27 12 13 25 0.926 0.2493 0.2493 0.2249 0.2249
2022-23 Cambridge-Isanti USHS-MN 26 25 22 47 1.808 0.4866 0.4866 0.4391 0.4391
2023-24 Cambridge-Isanti USHS-MN 27 27 16 43 1.593 0.4287 0.4287 0.3868 0.3868
2024-25 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 33 15 18 33 1.000 0.1205 0.1217 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Saint John's
+30.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10310
Forward overall
#536
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryant Wilson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Mock
Becker · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.