← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braden Crone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 41 4 1 5 0.122 0.0409 0.0448 0.1131 0.1239
2011-12 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 18 12 30 0.500 0.1677 0.1752 0.4634 0.4840
2012-13 AJHL 59 18 8 26 0.441 0.1478 0.1468 0.4084 0.4056
2013-14 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 60 22 26 48 0.800 0.2683 0.2525 0.7414 0.6979
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA 24 4 3 7 0.292
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA 25 4 3 7 0.280
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC 26 10 11 21 0.808
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 26 10 11 21 0.808
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC 27 6 15 21 0.778
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 27 6 15 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2014-15 · Concordia
+332.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27341
Forward overall
#937
Forward born in 1993
#827
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2010-11
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.