← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Rausch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Robbinsdale Armstrong/Cooper USHS-MN 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.0380 0.0380 0.0728 0.0728
2021-22 Robbinsdale Armstrong/Cooper USHS-MN 26 11 13 24 0.923 0.1169 0.1169 0.2241 0.2241
2022-23 Robbinsdale Armstrong/Cooper USHS-MN 26 19 17 36 1.385 0.1753 0.1753 0.3362 0.3362
2023-24 Robbinsdale Armstrong/Cooper USHS-MN 26 27 18 45 1.731 0.2191 0.2191 0.4202 0.4202
2024-25 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3674 0.3780 1.0569 1.0875
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC — 8 2 0 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Hamline
+44.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10105
Forward overall
#340
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2008-09
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2022-23
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.