← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Bannister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 53 10 13 23 0.434 0.1672 0.1672 0.6324 0.6324
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 37 3 16 19 0.513 0.1824 0.1824 0.5391 0.5391
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 55 20 40 60 1.091 0.3875 0.3721 1.1453 1.0998
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 27 7 15 22 0.815
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA GR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2022-23 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 16 1 3 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Mercyhurst
-21.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15888
Forward overall
#720
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2008-09
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.