← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Finlay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Powell River Kings BCHL 40 0 18 18 0.450 0.1676 0.1676 0.6557 0.6557
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 33 2 9 11 0.333 0.1321 0.1321 0.3499 0.3499
2021-22 Powell River Kings BCHL 49 6 16 22 0.449 0.1673 0.1582 0.6542 0.6185
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 34 0 9 9 0.265
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 28 4 6 10 0.357
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 23 1 1 2 0.087
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 27 3 2 5 0.185
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · Alaska Anchorage
+24.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10029
Defenseman overall
#1930
Defenseman born in 2001
#2276
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2013-14
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.