IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Kleven Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-10 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 2, Pick #44  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NTDP-U18 53 3 5 8 0.151 0.1170 0.1180 0.5616 0.5665
2019-20 — NTDP-U18 45 2 10 12 0.267 0.2068 0.2068 0.9926 0.9926
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 35 8 10 18 0.514
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 38 7 3 10 0.263
2020-21 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 22 5 2 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2020-21 · North Dakota
+185.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jake Linhart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kale Bennett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Western Michigan
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2010-11
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Steuck
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.