IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kale Bennett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 41 0 3 3 0.073 0.0450 0.0484 0.2157 0.2322
2013-14 Surrey Eagles BCHL 49 5 16 21 0.429 0.1597 0.1684 0.6245 0.6584
2014-15 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 43 5 11 16 0.372 0.1386 0.1397 0.5422 0.5464
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 2 13 15 0.278 0.1035 0.0988 0.4048 0.3862
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 33 3 5 8 0.242
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 34 0 6 6 0.176
2017-18 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 23 0 2 2 0.087
2016-17 Western Michigan D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13175
Defenseman overall
#1734
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bart Moran
Castleton · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Bruce
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.