IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Poolman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Austin Bruins NAHL 46 4 6 10 0.217 0.0861 0.0861 0.2282 0.2282
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 32 1 10 11 0.344 0.1281 0.1228 0.5010 0.4804
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 0 19 19 0.358 0.1335 0.1215 0.5224 0.4754
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA JR 38 1 4 5 0.132
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CCHA — 38 4 7 11 0.289
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CCHA — 28 2 6 8 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · St. Thomas
+148.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13978
Defenseman overall
#2656
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kittleson
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Batis
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.