IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam O'Hare Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-26 Country: Spain
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 37 3 7 10 0.270 0.0960 0.0960 0.2838 0.2838
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 31 4 12 16 0.516 0.1833 0.1742 0.5419 0.5151
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 16 2 1 3 0.188
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 18 2 5 7 0.389
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 22 4 10 14 0.636
2022-23 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 22 2 5 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Tufts
+113.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34133
Forward overall
#1850
Forward born in 2001
#3307
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Watson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincenzo Renda
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Facchini
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.