← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Onstott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 30 5 4 9 0.300 0.1102 0.1102 0.3167 0.3167
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 2 15 17 0.293 0.1077 0.1033 0.3094 0.2968
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hope College ACHA_D1 29 16 29 45 1.552
2024-25 Hope College ACHA_D1 29 16 29 45 1.552
2023-24 Hope College ACHA_D1 29 16 29 45 1.552
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA 16 1 6 7 0.438
2022-23 Hope College ACHA_D1 29 16 29 45 1.552
2021-22 Hope College ACHA_D1 29 16 29 45 1.552
2020-21 Hope College ACHA_D1 29 16 29 45 1.552

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42856
Forward overall
#2439
Forward born in 2001
#4680
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.