← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peyton Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Dickinson (N.D.) USHS-MN 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2692 0.2692 0.2429 0.2429
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 39 2 6 8 0.205 0.0762 0.0762 0.2172 0.2172
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 60 9 23 32 0.533 0.1980 0.1888 0.5647 0.5386
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 25 14 16 30 1.200
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 25 2 9 11 0.440
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 26 6 6 12 0.462
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 26 1 6 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Augsburg
+42.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28063
Forward overall
#1108
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.