IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Hendrickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 28 1 0 1 0.036 0.0120 0.0120 0.0331 0.0331
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 36 2 5 7 0.194 0.0691 0.0691 0.2041 0.2041
2021-22 — NAHL 21 1 0 1 0.048 0.0169 0.0158 0.0500 0.0468
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 15 1 0 1 0.067
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC GR 12 1 2 3 0.250
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 15 1 5 6 0.400
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+1832.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46737
Forward overall
#2757
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff MacPhee
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Lau
Trine · 2016-17
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mikhail Bryan
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.