IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff MacPhee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Calgary Royals AJHL 44 3 4 7 0.159 0.0534 0.0538 0.1475 0.1487
2004-05 Calgary Royals AJHL 61 7 15 22 0.361 0.1210 0.1162 0.3343 0.3210
2005-06 Calgary Royals AJHL 52 4 15 19 0.365 0.1226 0.1119 0.3387 0.3092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 27 4 11 15 0.556
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 23 0 3 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2006-07 · SUNY Geneseo
+21.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16187
Defenseman overall
#1402
Defenseman born in 1985
#1850
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rylan Burns
Amherst · 2004-05
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Seth Reda
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Sullivan
Babson · 2024-25
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.