IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylan Burns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-03-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 2 6 8 0.148 0.0576 0.0606 0.2160 0.2272
2002-03 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 57 5 21 26 0.456 0.1775 0.1790 0.6651 0.6708
2003-04 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 6 24 30 0.566 0.2203 0.2124 0.8254 0.7957
2004-05 — BCHL 59 1 28 29 0.491 0.1913 0.1755 0.7168 0.6576
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Amherst D3 — SR 28 1 12 13 0.464
2007-08 Amherst D3 — JR 26 1 7 8 0.308
2006-07 Amherst D3 — SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2005-06 Amherst D3 — FR 24 3 12 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2005-06 · Amherst
+248.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4214
Defenseman overall
#702
Defenseman born in 1984
#1831
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Barone
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.