IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Blanchett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 42 0 6 6 0.143 0.0508 0.0508 0.1500 0.1500
2021-22 — NAHL 56 11 11 22 0.393 0.1396 0.1458 0.4125 0.4308
2022-23 Powell River Kings BCHL 50 15 19 34 0.680 0.2620 0.2551 0.9908 0.9648
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 12 2 2 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Lake Superior State
+67.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8177
Defenseman overall
#1896
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
JC Humphreys
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Filip Jakobsson
Canton · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.