IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon Carlstrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Canterbury NE-Prep 28 0 3 3 0.107 0.0212 0.0212 0.0488 0.0488
2019-20 Canterbury NE-Prep 27 2 2 4 0.148 0.0293 0.0293 0.0675 0.0675
2020-21 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0510 0.0510 0.1466 0.1466
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 4 13 17 0.283 0.1041 0.1025 0.2990 0.2945
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 4 23 27 0.450 0.1653 0.1547 0.4750 0.4445
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 AHA SR 22 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12829
Defenseman overall
#2518
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pearce Vance
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Drapluk
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.