IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hank McDonough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 51 1 3 4 0.078 0.0278 0.0278 0.0823 0.0823
2021-22 — NAHL 16 0 2 2 0.125 0.0444 0.0423 0.1312 0.1250
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SR 23 0 4 4 0.174
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 — JR 18 0 3 3 0.167
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SO 8 0 3 3 0.375
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 — FR 22 0 1 1 0.045
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2022-23 · UMass Dartmouth
+14.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27737
Defenseman overall
#3765
Defenseman born in 2001
#6777
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Gilmour
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Ward
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
John Powers
Nichols · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.